"Digital Research Academy" is the current working title as it explains quite well what it is about. Why?I started giving trainings on Open Science and good practices in digital research, because I wanted to play a part in improving scientific quality and rigor. I just started doing this full time, but am already booked until the end of the year. So I know there is a market that longs for training on digital research skills and I cannot do it alone. One of my top skills is networking and bringing people together, so this is what I want to do through the idea of the Digital Research Academy. How?How do I plan to pull it off? This is where you come in (see also highlight boxes below)! 😉🤝 Of course I cannot and do not want to do this alone. There's several steps that we will need to take:
Currently I am in step 1 (gather information). I am trying to learn from existing cool initiatives like The Carpentries, Code Refinery, or FORRT. I am talking to a lot of people about their experiences and wishes. One thing I have identified is, that trainers want to not have to do this as a hobby, but get paid. So the current idea is to implement two income streams: (1) through memberships of organisations and (2) through course fees. Also I am looking into different networks that could offer good starting points for the idea. My most promising candidate is the Section Training & Education of the National Research Data Infrastructure (NFDI) in Germany. There are quite many ideas in their concept paper that would fit well with my vision of the Digital Research Academy: modular training material, train-the-trainer trainings, and potentially even certificate courses. Of course I also want to collaborate with the reproducibility networks (e.g. the German Reproducibility Network) and RSE networks (e.g. de-RSE). Finally, I also need to think about the organisational form this could take. Should it be an association, a non-profit (in German "gGmbH" I guess), something else? I really want this to be a network from the community for the community and the right form is probably crucial. Any hints from knowledgeable people (optimally German context) here would be highly appreciated! Via email or the pad. Please get involved and share your ideas. Either by messaging me directly or by adding your ideas to the idea pad.
All the best, Heidi P.S. Don't forget to submit your ideas for the de-RSE unconference. Would love to meet you there!
|
Heidi Seibold, MUCBOOK Clubhouse, Elsenheimerstr. 48, Munich, 81375 |
All things open and reproducible data science.
I get asked for career advice all the time (even though I am just figuring stuff out myself). Generally I try to help by listening and asking questions, but there is one thing that I tell everyone who wants to hear it: pick work where you like the people. How do you pick the research group you want to work with? My recommendation is to pick based on two things: Do you like the topics they work on? Do you get along with the people in the group (in particular your boss/supervisor)? The first is...
The academic publishing system is broken. I think we can all agree on that. But what if you want to have an academic career and at the same time stick to your values of openness? Here's my pragmatic take. I understand the fear of not publishing in established journals. We all want to have a good career and feel like publishing our papers in the journals that our peers and employers deem worthy seems like an important step. As a pragmatic open scientist, I generally recommend not to be too...
Have you complained about the inefficiency of public administration before? I think, you're not alone. In this post I want to share my journey with trying to help increase efficiency through data literacy in the public sector. I am a person who likes to solve problems. Most of my time is spent solving problems in academia, but I decided to leave my usual grounds for a special project where I can help solving problems in the public sector. Why do I care about solving problems in the public...