How to pick a research group to apply to?


I get asked for career advice all the time (even though I am just figuring stuff out myself). Generally I try to help by listening and asking questions, but there is one thing that I tell everyone who wants to hear it: pick work where you like the people.

How do you pick the research group you want to work with? My recommendation is to pick based on two things:

  1. Do you like the topics they work on?
  2. Do you get along with the people in the group (in particular your boss/supervisor)?

The first is quite obvious for most people, but the fact that the second may be even more important is not as clear.

Team dynamics matter so much! I've seen people start a (PhD) position and be super unhappy, because their supervision and/or team work sucked.

Sometimes it is difficult to know before, but there are a few things one can do:

  • Talk to the people who work in the group, collaborate with the group, or did so in the past: Do they like working with the people? What are group meetings like? How does supervision work? How is collaboration managed? Are there team events?
  • Ask questions to the future boss (e.g. in the job interview): How do they view supervision? How do they manage the group? How is collaboration supported?

Doing research is tough and you need to be able to depend on each other in a team. Just like when you go on a challenging multi-day hike: you bring people you can trust and who you will be able to stand for that amount of time.

This hike is your work and it will last months or years.

If the group dynamics are toxic you can't do good work, you'll suffer, and all you can really do in most cases is leave. Because at least in Germany, academic institutions are not built to throw out toxic leaders. So if you can, spare yourself the trouble and pick nice people to work with.

I wish it were a simple as it sounds, but I know it isn't. Sending out a big hug to everyone who currently is in a situation where they don't like working with the people around them πŸ’œ.

All the best,

Heidi

In other news...

Apply to become a trainer!

The Digital Research Academy is looking for new trainers. You can join by applying for our upcoming Train-the-Trainer program.

​

Introduction to Podcasting πŸŽ™οΈ 🎧

A free online course with the host of Code for Thought (Peter Schmidt)

July 17, 2:00 β†’ 4:00 PM CEST on Zoom Sign up now!


P.S. If you're enjoying this newsletter, please recommend it to your friends and colleagues. You can do so by sharing the following link: https://heidiseibold.ck.page/​

Let's connect!

​Mastodon | LinkedIn | Website​

Digital Research Academy

​Mastodon | LinkedIn | Website​

Heidi Seibold, MUCBOOK Clubhouse, Elsenheimerstr. 48, Munich, 81375
​Unsubscribe Β· Preferences Β· My newsletters are licensed under CC-BY 4.0​

Dr. Heidi Seibold

All things open and reproducible data science.

Read more from Dr. Heidi Seibold
Mel, Joyce, and Heidi at the notary

I am excited to share that the Digital Research Academy incorporation is almost done. We had our notary appointment last week, set up the bank account and are now waiting for the official registration of the DRA Digital Research Academy GmbH. I published my first post about the initial idea for the Digital Research Academy in May 2023. Now, just a year and a few months later, the Digital Research Academy is becoming not only an initiative but a company. Last week Joyce Kao, Melanie Imming and...

Logo

I am in the process of making my newsletter FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable). Here's how. I am an advocate for Open Science. The FAIR priciples are very near and dear to my heart. I was excited when the Open Science folks at JΓΌlich archived a bunch of my posts and gave them a persistent identifier (DOI, see archived posts here). This was exactly what I was still missing to make my posts more FAIR. However, I cannot expect them to take care of archiving all my posts and...

The academic publishing system is broken. I think we can all agree on that. But what if you want to have an academic career and at the same time stick to your values of openness? Here's my pragmatic take. I understand the fear of not publishing in established journals. We all want to have a good career and feel like publishing our papers in the journals that our peers and employers deem worthy seems like an important step. As a pragmatic open scientist, I generally recommend not to be too...