Open and/or efficient? Choosing tools as open scientist ๐Ÿ› ๏ธ


As an open scientist I strive to use open source software and open tools whenever possible. But sometimes I choose a more efficient tool over the open tool. When and why? Let's break it down!

It is no secret that I am an open source enthusiast. I've been working with R since 2009 and the wonderful R community has shown me the path to Open Science. But at the same time I am using commercial tools like this newsletter service. I use Miro for teaching and Google Docs for collaborating on documents.

Since working on my self-employment and the Digital Research Academy, the decisions between open tools and other tools have become more and more difficult. Sometimes there are no good open source options available, but sometimes I just want to use a closed tool, because it is just so good at what I want to do.

So I've decided that I need to somehow at least be clear with myself and the team, what I think is a good strategy. Let's see what they say ๐Ÿ˜‰๐Ÿ˜….

Heidi's rules for deciding on tools (WIP):

  1. Change a running system only when there is a strong pain.
  2. If there is a tool that is far better than anything else, use it.
  3. If there are several good options: Open over closed. Non-commercial over commercial.
  4. Exceptions apply, when the entity offering the tool has intentions we don't like (e.g. never use tools connected to Elsevier).

Ok, so this list is a work in progress. I am very much looking forward to your thoughts! How do you make those kinds of decisions?

โ€‹

In other news

Open Science Retreat 2024

I am so excited to announce that there will be a second edition of the Open Science Retreat. Edition 2024 is co-organised by OSC-NL: the bottom up, community-led, social infrastructure of Open Science Communities in the Netherlands, and will take place on the sea side, again amidst nature in a secluded setting. Hope to see you in the Dutch dunes next March!

Updates on the Digital Research Academy

Our Train-the-Trainer (TTT) pilots were successful and we are currently working on the plans for the next TTTs. You can find the materials from both TTT pilots on the OSF:

Want to get involved, too? There's a mailing list, where we will let you know about next meetups, TTTs, and more:

Interested in receiving training? We on-boarded 11 trainers and everyone is excited to get started ๐Ÿค“. Get in touch and receive targeted training โœ….

โ€‹

That's all for today. Hope you enjoyed it! If you did, consider forwarding this post to your friends and colleagues.

All the best,

Heidi


P.S. If you're enjoying this newsletter, please consider supporting my work by leaving a tip.

Heidi Seibold, MUCBOOK Clubhouse, Elsenheimerstr. 48, Munich, 81375
โ€‹Unsubscribe ยท Preferences ยท My newsletters are licensed under CC-BY 4.0โ€‹

Dr. Heidi Seibold

All things open and reproducible data science.

Read more from Dr. Heidi Seibold

I get asked for career advice all the time (even though I am just figuring stuff out myself). Generally I try to help by listening and asking questions, but there is one thing that I tell everyone who wants to hear it: pick work where you like the people. How do you pick the research group you want to work with? My recommendation is to pick based on two things: Do you like the topics they work on? Do you get along with the people in the group (in particular your boss/supervisor)? The first is...

The academic publishing system is broken. I think we can all agree on that. But what if you want to have an academic career and at the same time stick to your values of openness? Here's my pragmatic take. I understand the fear of not publishing in established journals. We all want to have a good career and feel like publishing our papers in the journals that our peers and employers deem worthy seems like an important step. As a pragmatic open scientist, I generally recommend not to be too...

Have you complained about the inefficiency of public administration before? I think, you're not alone. In this post I want to share my journey with trying to help increase efficiency through data literacy in the public sector. I am a person who likes to solve problems. Most of my time is spent solving problems in academia, but I decided to leave my usual grounds for a special project where I can help solving problems in the public sector. Why do I care about solving problems in the public...