Guest post: Meet Dr Elisabeth Kugler, director of Zeeks – Art for Geeks. In this post she will share her career path and how her work connects with open science now that she is an entrepreneur. |
I am Dr Elisabeth Kugler, director of Zeeks – Art for Geeks – a company that transforms how people think about data. We achieve this by data analysis, visualization, and communication. And our speciality is image-based data and strategies. In this article, I aim to discuss Zeeks' perspective on open science and emphasize that industry does not necessarily exclude open science. Throughout my academic journey, I was fortunate to receive unwavering support for open science from my supervisors and collaborators. The majority of my work in education and academia involved open-access publications, shared data, and an open methodology in alignment with the principles of open science. As a first-generation scientist, the notion that science could be anything but open contradicted my core beliefs. And as I progressed in academia, my primary motivation became clear: I aspired to enhance the overall impact and accessibility of scientific knowledge. – I loved teaching, mentoring, sharing – and anything to do with communication. So, when I decided to move away from the academic career track and form my own company in 2022, I did not want the idea of “leaving academia and open science behind” to manifest in my life. And thankfully, it did not become my reality. On the contrary, I do still work closely within the spheres of academia, research, and science. Be it peer-reviewing of papers or guest lecturing at several universities. We are also involved in a lot of knowledge sharing activities such as via blogs, our newsletters, and YouTube. For us, a major aspect of open science is collaboration and networking – at Zeeks our most valuable assets are the people we work with - the customers, colleagues, clients – and most importantly our Zeeks tribe. Especially since forming Zeeks, I have come to learn that connecting a diverse network of scientists, artists, and the general public is the most powerful tool to advance science. But since forming my company meant leaving purely academic work, some things have changed obviously too – a lot of our internal, and most of our client work cannot be freely shared. Also, doing work for free is no longer the standard, but the exception – simply because a business needs to be sustainable. So, I think for me the main three points I would have loved to know when moving from academia to industry are:
If you are interested in learning more about the work that we do, we would love it if you signed up for our newsletter:https://zeeks-artforgeeks.com/pages/newsletter-sign-up Our “Keep it Science” podcast: https://content.zeeks-artforgeeks.com/kis All the best, Elisabeth P.S. If you're enjoying this newsletter, please consider supporting my work by leaving a tip.
|
Heidi Seibold, MUCBOOK Clubhouse, Elsenheimerstr. 48, Munich, 81375 |
All things open and reproducible data science.
I am excited to share that the Digital Research Academy incorporation is almost done. We had our notary appointment last week, set up the bank account and are now waiting for the official registration of the DRA Digital Research Academy GmbH. I published my first post about the initial idea for the Digital Research Academy in May 2023. Now, just a year and a few months later, the Digital Research Academy is becoming not only an initiative but a company. Last week Joyce Kao, Melanie Imming and...
I am in the process of making my newsletter FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable). Here's how. I am an advocate for Open Science. The FAIR priciples are very near and dear to my heart. I was excited when the Open Science folks at Jülich archived a bunch of my posts and gave them a persistent identifier (DOI, see archived posts here). This was exactly what I was still missing to make my posts more FAIR. However, I cannot expect them to take care of archiving all my posts and...
I get asked for career advice all the time (even though I am just figuring stuff out myself). Generally I try to help by listening and asking questions, but there is one thing that I tell everyone who wants to hear it: pick work where you like the people. How do you pick the research group you want to work with? My recommendation is to pick based on two things: Do you like the topics they work on? Do you get along with the people in the group (in particular your boss/supervisor)? The first is...